As i head of to the Yucatan, and Chitchen Itza to play drums at the synthesis2012 festival i wanted to reflect on the visions of Terence Mckenna. And to remind people that it was 'coincidence' or 'meaningful synchronicity' that the Mayan long count cycle happened to correspond with his own historical graphing, and futurist ideas about exponential information explosion, I-Ching and the Genetic Code, wrapped up in his fantastical 'psychoactive' prose.
 I think that Terence Mckenna had a good 'partnership' model for a co-operative, optimistic future, and his thoughts on 2012 still resonate with me and with www.raw360.net
--Steven 'fly agaric 23' Pratt
 From Further Weirdness with Terence Mckenna" Paul Krassner, Magic Mushrooms and Other Highs - From Toad Slime to Ecstacy. Ten Speed Press. 2004
Q. What are your visions of alternative scenarios that are upcoming, either in December 2012 or before?
  
  A. Well, i've spent a long time thinking about this, although i 
realized about a year ago that, in a sense, it's not really my issue. 
The funny thing is, here i have this wave, it predicts every second 
between here and December 12, 2012, i show it to people and their first 
question is, 'So what happens afterwards?" It dosen't address that. It 
addresses all moments before that. nevertheless, i feel the 
force question, and i've created a series of scenarios in ascending 
weirdness which answer the question. 
  
  A low weirdness answer would be, suddenly everyone begins to behave 
appropriately. This is kind of Buddhist, Taosit approach. Now, the 
interesting thing about that scenario is, the first thirty seconds of 
that we can predict - appropriate behavior would probably be to take 
your foot off your neighbor's neck. Step back from what you're doing.
  
  And then i always imagine - for some reason, i don't know why - that 
everybody would take off their cloths and go outside. But after that i 
can't figure - thats only the first thirty seconds of appropriate 
behavior. Since we never had that, we can't imagine what it would be 
like.
  
  Then there's the transformation-of-physics scenario, which basically 
says, "All boundaries dissolve." What that would probably be like, the 
first hour of it would be like a thousand micrograms of LSD. After that 
we can't imagine or predict, because again it would have so totally 
changed the context that you could no longer predict it.
  
  Then there are the catastrophic scenarios that revolve around the 
question, "Death, where is thy sting?" And probably the most efficient 
of those is the planetesimal-impact scenario. A very large object 
strikes the earth and kills everybody, and that's it.
  
  Q. A blunt object
  
  A. It's a blunt solution. Sort of in that same category is the blue 
star in Sagittarius. And then a kind of intermediate between those two 
the sun will explode. That would certainly clear the disc and fulfill 
the whole thing. The planet vaporizes, and collectively we and all life 
on earth move into the shimmering capsules of the post-mortem realm, 
whatever that is. Novel, novel.
  
  When i worked with the timewave, i argued strenuously that it reflects
 the ebb and flow of novelty, but somebody will come up with something 
like the release of the Sergeant Pepper album or the O.J 
Simpson trial, and then we see that it's lost in the noise. What the 
wave seems most pristinely to predict, or what parallels the wave most 
closely, is the evolution of technology, and i think technology is 
something that we haven't really understood. In a sense, technology is 
the alchemical journey for the condensation of the soul and the union of
 the spirit and matter in some kind of hyperobject. 
  
  The rise of the web has been a great boost to my fantasies along these
 lines, because now i can see with the Web from here to the eschaton. 
Apparently, it's a technology for dissolving space, time, personally and
 just releasing everybody into a data stream, something like the 
imagination. Then that's why the ultimate technological fantasy along 
this line of thought is what is conventionally called a time machine. 
  
  There's an interesting aspect to the time machine. The wave describes 
the ebb and flow of novelty in time, but then you reach a point where 
it's so novel that it fails beyond that point. Well, a time-traveling 
technology would cause such a system to fail, because it's a description
 of the unfolding seriality of linear events, which a time machine would
 disrupt.
  
  So it may be that it isn't explosion of the sun, or the coming of the 
aliens, or the descent of the second person of the Trinity, it's simply 
that a technology is put into place that destroys linear time and, from 
thence forward, when you give your address you have to say not only 
where but when. There are some problems with this.
              
  And then here is a slightly more interesting and 
woo-woo scenario. The thing that's called the grandfather paradox - 
somebody pointed out it's not called the father paradox because 
apparently you want to avoid an Oedipal situation - and it's simply the 
following objection: if you could travel into the past, you could kill 
your grandfather. If you killed your grandfather, you wouldn't exist. 
Therefore, you couldn't travel into the past. Therefore, time travel is 
impossible.
    
    One idea i have for an end of history scenario: Time travel becomes 
more and more discussible, finally there are laboratories working on it,
 finally there is a prototype machine, finally it's possible to conceive
 of a test; and so on the morning of December 12, 2012, at the world 
Temporal Institute headquarters in the Amazon Basin, by a worldwide, 
high definition, three-dimensional hook up, the entire world tunes in to
 see the first flight into time. And the lady temponaut comes to the 
microphone and makes a few brief statements, hands are shaken, the 
champagne bottle is smashed, she climbs into her time-machine, pushes 
the button and disappears into the far flung reaches of the future. Now,
 the interesting question is, what happens next? And i have already 
established for myself that you can travel backwards into the past, but 
you can't travel further into the past than the invention of the first 
time machine, for the simple reason that there are no time machines 
before that, and if you were to take one where there are none, you get 
another paradox. 
    
    So what happens when the lady temponaut slips into the future? Well,
 i think what would happen a millisecond later is tens of thousands of 
time machines would arrive from all points in the future, having come 
back through time, of course, to witness the first flight into time. 
Exactly as if you could fly your beachcraft back to Kitty hawk, North 
Carolina, to that windy morning when the Wright brothers rolled their 
flyer out and fueled 'er up. And that's as far as the road goes. That's 
the end of the time road. 
    
    But the grandfather paradox persists. One of those time travelers 
from 5,000 years in the future, on their way back to the first 
time-travel incident, could stop and kill his grandfather, and then we 
have this whole problem again. So i thought about this for a long time, 
and i think i've found my way around it. But, as usual, at the cost of 
further weirdness. 
    
    Here's what would really happen if we invented a time 
machine of that sort. The lady temponaut pushes the button, and instead 
of all time machines appearing instantly in the next moment, in order to
 preserve the system from that paradox, what will happen is, the rest of
 history of the universe will occur instantly. And so that's it. I call 
it the God whistle.
    
    This is because you thought you were building a time machine, and in
 a sense you were, but the time machine isn't what you thought it was. 
It caused the rest of time to happen instantaneously, and so the 
furthest out developments of life, matter, and technology in the 
universe can right up against you a millisecond after you break that 
barrier, and in fact you discover that traveling time is not traveling 
time, it's a doorway into eternity, which is all of time, and that's why
 it becomes more like a hyperspatial deal than a simple linear 
time-travel thing.
    
    There's been a parallel development which has caused me to be more 
confident. We're now beginning to build this parallel world called the 
Wolrd Wide Web. And you can bet that long before we reach 2012, the 
major religions of the world will build virtual realities of their 
eschatological scenarios. There will be the Islamic paradise, the 
Christian millenium, the Buddhist shunyata - these will be channels that
 you tune into to see if you like it and want to join, so in a sense 
guaranteeing we will have a virtual singularity. 
    
    It's all very well to try to understand the end point, but recall 
that where we are relative to the end point is in resonance with the 
year 950 AD. We're like the people in 950 AD trying to understand the 
web, the hydrogen bomb and the catscanner. How can we? My God, we don't 
even have calculus yet. Newton hasn't been born yet, let alone Einstein.
 I mean we're running around - essentially we're primitives, is what i'm
 saying. We don't have tools yet to conceive of the object of 2012. We 
must build those tools between now and then. And good places to start 
are with the web, psychedelic drugs, whatever is the most cutting edge 
and most far out.
    
    Q. So that saying, "May you live in interesting times," is supposed 
to have been a chinese curse, but if the ruling class had control of 
language, it would curse them, but it was a blessing to the people who made it interesting times.
    
    A. I think it's saying the same thing as the Irish toast [heavy brogue], "May you be alive at the end of the world."
    
    Q. Meanwhile, my Chinese fortune cookie predicted that you and i 
would cross paths again and also that i will enjoy another repast soon.
    
    A. We must meet in a Chinese restaurant and save the oracle unnecessary embarrassment. 
    
    
    - from Further Weirdness with Terence Mckenna" Paul Krassner, Magic Mushrooms and Other Highs - From Toad Slime to Ecstacy. Ten Speed Press. 2004
              
              Paul Krassner is the author of One Hand Jerking: Reports From an Investigative Satirist; 
                he publishes The Disneyland Memorial Orgy at www.paulkrassner.com.
http://www.maybelogic.org/maybequarterly/06/0604FurtherWeirdness.htm 
No comments:
Post a Comment